智能配用电系统的网络攻击检测与保护控制技术：发展与挑战*

doi:10.11985/2023.02.012

电气工程学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 125-141.doi: 10.11985/2023.02.012

扫码分享

智能配用电系统的网络攻击检测与保护控制技术：发展与挑战^*

曾嵘¹(), 李勇¹(), 曹一家²(), 谢李为¹, 邵霞¹

1.湖南大学电气与信息工程学院长沙 410082
2.长沙理工大学电气与信息工程学院长沙 410114

收稿日期:2022-06-26 修回日期:2022-08-06 出版日期:2023-06-25 发布日期:2023-07-12
通讯作者: 李勇，男，1982年生，博士，教授。主要研究方向为智能配电网控制与保护、电力系统稳定性分析与控制、广域测量系统(WAMS)及其应用。E-mail：yongli@hnu.edu.cn
作者简介:曾嵘，男，1998年生，博士研究生。主要研究方向为智能配用电信息物理系统。E-mail：zengrong1998@hnu.edu.cn
曹一家，男，1969年生，博士，教授。主要研究方向为电力系统稳定与控制、复杂系统的智能控制。E-mail：yijiacao@hnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(U1966207);深圳市承接国家重大科技(CJGJZD20200617102405015)

Cyber Attack Detection and Protection Control Technology for Smart Power Distribution and Utilization System：Developments and Challenges

ZENG Rong¹(), LI Yong¹(), CAO Yijia²(), XIE Liwei¹, SHAO Xia¹

1. College of Electrical and Information Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082
2. School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114

Received:2022-06-26 Revised:2022-08-06 Online:2023-06-25 Published:2023-07-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

先进信息技术在智能配用电系统(Smart power distribution and utilization system，SPDUS)中的广泛应用，加深了系统信息侧与电力物理侧的耦合程度，智能配用电系统已逐渐转变为信息-物理空间高度融合、信息资源与物理资源相互结合与协调的智能配用电信息物理系统(Smart power distribution and utilization cyber physical system，SPDU-CPS)。本文重点从面向SPDU-CPS的网络攻击入侵检测、网络攻击防御保护以及自愈控制三个角度，对国内外相关技术的发展与挑战进行总结、梳理。在网络攻击入侵检测方面，总结了基于偏差类、基于特征类以及混合类网络攻击检测方法的检测思路及实施路径；在网络攻击防御保护方面，总结了提升信息网络防御能力的信息侧保护方法、基于资源优化配置和数据校正保护的物理侧保护方法以及融合两侧信息及保护功能的信息物理协同保护方法；在自愈控制方面，对传统电力物理侧自愈控制以及基于信息物理协同的自愈控制现有研究进行了归纳和整理。最后，结合SPDU-CPS的特点及发展趋势，对未来研究方向进行了展望。

关键词: 智能配用电系统, 信息物理系统, 网络攻击入侵检测, 网络攻击防御保护, 自愈控制

Abstract:

The extensive application of advanced information technology in smart power distribution and utilization system(SPDUS) deepens the coupling degree between the information side of the system and the power physical side. Smart power distribution systems have been gradually transformed into smart power distribution and utilization cyber physical system(SPDU-CPS) with a high degree of integration of information-physical space. The research status at home and abroad from three perspectives of SPDU-CPS network attack intrusion detection, network attack defense and protection, and self-healing control is summarized and prospected. In the aspect of network attack intrusion detection, the detection ideas and implementation paths of network attack detection methods based on deviation class, feature class and hybrid class are summarized. In the aspect of network attack defense and protection, the information side protection method, the physical side protection method based on resource optimization allocation and data correction protection and the information physical cooperative protection method combining the information and protection functions of both sides are introduced. In the aspect of self-healing control, the existing researches on the traditional power physics self-healing control and the self-healing control based on information physics coordination are summarized and sorted out. Finally, the future research direction is prospected.

Key words: Smart power distribution and utilization system, cyber physical system, network attack intrusion detection, cyber attack defense protection, self-healing control

中图分类号:

TM561

曾嵘, 李勇, 曹一家, 谢李为, 邵霞. 智能配用电系统的网络攻击检测与保护控制技术：发展与挑战^*[J]. 电气工程学报, 2023, 18(2): 125-141.

ZENG Rong, LI Yong, CAO Yijia, XIE Liwei, SHAO Xia. Cyber Attack Detection and Protection Control Technology for Smart Power Distribution and Utilization System：Developments and Challenges[J]. Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2023, 18(2): 125-141.

图/表 5

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

参考文献 114

[1]	郭庆来, 辛蜀骏, 孙宏斌, 等. 电力系统信息物理融合建模与综合安全评估:驱动力与研究构想[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(6):1481-1489,1761.
	GUO Qinglai, XIN Shujun, SUN Hongbin, et al. Power system cyber-physical fusion modeling and comprehensive safety assessment:Driving force and research concept[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(6):1481-1489,1761.
[2]	赵俊华, 文福拴, 薛禹胜, 等. 电力信息物理融合系统的建模分析与控制研究框架[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2011, 35(16):1-8.
	ZHAO Junhua, WEN Fushuan, XUE Yusheng, et al. Research framework of modeling analysis and control of power cyberphysical fusion system[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2011, 35(16):1-8.
[3]	黄毕尧, 白晓民, 李定贻, 等. 美国智能配用电技术综述[J]. 供用电, 2014(11):16-21.
	HUANG Biyao, BAI Xiaomin, LI Dingyi, et al. A review of intelligent power distribution technology in the United States[J]. Power Supply, 2014(11):16-21.
[4]	郭庆来, 辛蜀骏, 王剑辉, 等. 由乌克兰停电事件看信息能源系统综合安全评估[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2016, 40(5):145-147.
	GUO Qinglai, XIN Shujun, WANG Jianhui, et al. Comprehensive safety assessment of information energy system from the power outage incident in Ukraine[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2016, 40(5):145-147.
[5]	李更丰, 邱爱慈, 黄格超, 等. 电力系统应对极端事件的新挑战与未来研究展望[J]. 智慧电力, 2019, 47(8):1-11.
	LI Gengfeng, QIU Aici, HUANG Gechao, et al. New challenges and future research prospects of power system response to extreme events[J]. Smart Power, 2019, 47(8):1-11.
[6]	王琦, 李梦雅, 汤奕, 等. 电力信息物理系统网络攻击与防御研究综述(一)建模与评估[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019, 43(9):9-21.
	WANG Qi, LI Mengya, TANG Yi, et al. A review on research of cyber-attacks and defense in cyber physical power systems part one modelling and evaluation[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019, 43(9):9-21.
[7]	王琦, 邰伟, 汤奕, 等. 面向电力信息物理系统的虚假数据注入攻击研究综述[J]. 自动化学报, 2019, 45(1):72-83.
	WANG Qi, TAI Wei, TANG Yi, et al. A review of research on false data injection attacks on power cyberphysical systems[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2019, 45(1):72-83.
[8]	王先培, 田猛, 董政呈, 等. 输电网虚假数据攻击研究综述[J]. 电网技术, 2016, 40(11):3406-3414.
	WANG Xianpei, TIAN Meng, DONG Zhengcheng, et al. A review of research on false data attacks on transmission networks[J]. Power System Technology, 2016, 40(11):3406-3414.
[9]	卫志农, 陈和升, 倪明, 等. 电力信息物理系统中恶性数据定义、构建与防御挑战[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2016, 40(17):70-78.
	WEI Zhinong, CHEN Hesheng, NI Ming, et al. Vicious data definition,construction and defense challenges in power cyberphysical system[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2016, 40(17):70-78.
[10]	朱杰, 张葛祥, 王涛, 等. 电力系统状态估计欺诈性数据攻击及防御综述[J]. 电网技术, 2016, 40(8):2406-2415.
	ZHU Jie, ZHANG Gexiang, WANG Tao, et al. A review of fraudulent data attacks on power system state estimation and defense[J]. Power System Technology, 2016, 40(8):2406-2415.
[11]	汤奕, 李梦雅, 王琦, 等. 电力信息物理系统网络攻击与防御研究综述(二)检测与保护[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019, 43(10):1-9,18.
	TANG Yi, LI Mengya, WANG Qi, et al. A review on research of cyber-attacks and defense in cyber physical power systems part two detection and protection[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019, 43(10):1-9,18.
[12]	朱炳铨, 郭逸豪, 郭创新, 等. 信息失效威胁下的电力信息物理系统安全评估与防御研究综述[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2021, 49(1):178-187.
	ZHU Bingquan, GUO Yihao, GUO Chuangxin, et al. Review on security assessment and defense of power information physical system under information failure threat[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2021, 49(1):178-187.
[13]	汤奕, 陈倩, 李梦雅, 等. 电力信息物理融合系统环境中的网络攻击研究综述[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2016, 40(17):59-69.
	TANG Yi, CHEN Qian, LI Mengya, et al. A review of network attack research in power information physical fusion system environment[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2016, 40(17):59-69.
[14]	李田, 苏盛, 杨洪明, 等. 电力信息物理系统的攻击行为与安全防护[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2017, 41(22):162-167.
	LI Tian, SU Sheng, YANG Hongming, et al. Attacks and cyber security defense in cyber-physical power system[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2017, 41(22):162-167.
[15]	ASHOK A, GOVINDARASU M, WANG J. Cyber-physical attack-resilient wide-area monitoring,protection,and control for the power grid[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2017, 105(7):1389-1407. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2686394
[16]	张宇航, 倪明, 孙永辉, 等. 针对网络攻击的配电网信息物理系统风险量化评估[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019, 43(21):12-22,33.
	ZHANG Yuhang, NI Ming, SUN Yonghui, et al. Risk quantitative assessment of distribution network information physical system for network attack[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019, 43(21):12-22,33.
[17]	CASE D U. Analysis of the cyber attack on the Ukrainian power grid[J]. Electricity Information Sharing and Analysis Center (E-ISAC), 2016, 388:1-29.
[18]	叶夏明, 文福拴, 尚金成, 等. 电力系统中信息物理安全风险传播机制[J]. 电网技术, 2015, 39(11):3072-3079.
	YE Xiaming, WEN Fushuan, SHANG Jincheng, et al. Transmission mechanism of information physical security risk in power system[J]. Power System Technology, 2015, 39(11):3072-3079.
[19]	曹一家, 张宇栋, 包哲静. 电力系统和通信网络交互影响下的连锁故障分析[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2013, 33(1):7-11.
	CAO Yijia, ZHANG Yudong, BAO Zhejing. Interlocking fault analysis under the interaction of power system and communication network[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2013, 33(1):7-11.
[20]	梁英, 王耀坤, 刘科研, 等. 计及网络信息安全的配电网CPS故障仿真[J]. 电网技术, 2021, 45(1):235-242.
	LIANG Ying, WANG Yaokun, LIU Keyan, et al. CPS fault simulation of distribution network considering network information security[J]. Power System Technology, 2021, 45(1):235-242.
[21]	李培恺, 刘云, 辛焕海, 等. 分布式协同控制模式下配电网信息物理系统脆弱性评估[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2018, 42(10):22-29,59.
	LI Peikai, LIU Yun, XIN Huanhai, et al. Vulnerability assessment for cyber-physical system of distribution network in distributed cooperative control mode[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2018, 42(10):22-29,59.
[22]	MAHJABIN T, XIAO Y, SUN G, et al. A survey of distributed denial-of-service attack,prevention,and mitigation techniques[J]. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2017, 13(12):1550147717741463.
[23]	HUSEINOVIC A, MRDOVIC S, BICAKCI K, et al. A survey of denial-of-service attacks and solutions in the smart grid[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8:177447-177470. doi: 10.1109/Access.6287639
[24]	GUO Y, TEN C W, HU S, et al. Modeling distributed denial of service attack in advanced metering infrastructure[C]// 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT). IEEE, 2015:1-5.
[25]	ZHANG C, LUO F, SUN M, et al. Modeling and defending advanced metering infrastructure subjected to distributed denial-of-service attacks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 2020, 8(3):2106-2117. doi: 10.1109/TNSE.2020.3015220
[26]	ZHANG H, CHENG P, SHI L, et al. Optimal DoS attack policy against remote state estimation[C]// 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, December 10-13,2013,Firenze,Italy. IEEE, 2013:5444-5449.
[27]	ZHANG H, ZHU Y, LI Z, et al. DoS attack power allocation against remote state estimation via a block fading channel[C]// 2018 37th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), July 25-27,2018,Wuhan,China. IEEE, 2018:6441-6446.
[28]	BEG O A, NGUYEN L V, JOHNSON T T, et al. Signal temporal logic-based attack detection in DC microgrids[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2018, 10(4):3585-3595. doi: 10.1109/TSG.5165411
[29]	LIU S, LIU P X, WANG X. Effects of cyber attacks on islanded microgrid frequency control[C]// 2016 IEEE 20th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), May 04-06,2016,Nanchang,China. IEEE, 2016:461-464.
[30]	LIU S, SIANO P, WANG X. Intrusion-detector-dependent frequency regulation for microgrids under denial-of-service attacks[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2019, 14(2):2593-2596. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.4267003
[31]	LIU J, DU Y, YIM S, et al. Steady-state analysis of microgrid distributed control under denial of service attacks[J]. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 2020, 9(5):5311-5325. doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2020.2990879
[32]	WANG Y, ZHANG M, SONG K, et al. An optimal DoS attack strategy disturbing the distributed economic dispatch of microgrid[J]. Complexity, 2021:5539829.
[33]	ZHANG H, CHENG P, SHI L, et al. Optimal DoS attack scheduling in wireless networked control system[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2015, 24(3):843-852. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2015.2462741
[34]	LIU Y, NING P, REITER M K. False data injection attacks against state estimation in electric power grids[J]. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC), 2011, 14(1):1-33.
[35]	ZHUANG P, LIANG H. False data injection attacks against state-of-charge estimation of battery energy storage systems in smart distribution networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2020, 12(3):2566-2577. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2020.3042926
[36]	AMIN B M R, TAGHIZADEH S, RAHMAN M S, et al. Cyber attacks in smart grid-dynamic impacts,analyses and recommendations[J]. IET Cyber-Physical Systems:Theory & Applications, 2020, 5(4):321-329.
[37]	STANCULESCU M, DDLEANU S, ANDREI P C, et al. A case study of an industrial power plant under cyberattack:Simulation and analysis[J]. Energies, 2021, 14(9):2568. doi: 10.3390/en14092568
[38]	TEIXERIA A, DAN G, SANDBERG H, et al. Security of smart distribution grids:Data integrity attacks on integrated volt/VAR control and countermeasures[C]// 2014 American Control Conference, June 04-06,2014,Portland,OR,USA. IEEE, 2014:4372-4378.
[39]	DENG R, ZHUANG P, LIANG H. False data injection attacks against state estimation in power distribution systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2018, 10(3):2871-2881. doi: 10.1109/TSG.5165411
[40]	ZHUANG P, DENG R, LIANG H. False data injection attacks against state estimation in multiphase and unbalanced smart distribution systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2019, 10(6):6000-6013. doi: 10.1109/TSG.5165411
[41]	TRAN N N, POTA H R, TRAN Q N, et al. Designing constraint-based false data-injection attacks against the unbalanced distribution smart grids[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2021, 8(11):9422-9435. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3056649
[42]	HUANG T, WANG B, RAMOS-RUIZ J, et al. Detection of cyber attacks in renewable-rich microgrids using dynamic watermarking[C]// 2020 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM),August 02-06,2020,Montreal, QC, Canada. IEEE, 2020:1-5.
[43]	JAVANMARDI H, DEHGHANI M, MOHAMMADI M, et al. BMI-based load frequency control in microgrids under false data injection attacks[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2021, 16(1):1021-1031. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2021.3054947
[44]	ZHANG H, MENG W, QI J, et al. Distributed load sharing under false data injection attack in an inverter-based microgrid[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2018, 66(2):1543-1551. doi: 10.1109/TIE.41
[45]	ISLAM S N, MAHMUD M A, OO A M T. Impact of optimal false data injection attacks on local energy trading in a residential microgrid[J]. ICT Express, 2018, 4(1):30-34. doi: 10.1016/j.icte.2018.01.015
[46]	ZHANG X, YANG X, LIN J, et al. On false data injection attacks against the dynamic microgrid partition in the smart grid[C]// 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), June 08-12,2015,London, UK. IEEE, 2015:7222-7227.
[47]	CHLELA M, JOOS G, KASSOUF M, et al. Real-time testing platform for microgrid controllers against false data injection cybersecurity attacks[C]// 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), July 17-21,2016,Boston, MA, USA. IEEE, 2016:1-5.
[48]	LI S, YILMAZ Y, WANG X. Quickest detection of false data injection attack in wide-area smart grids[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2014, 6(6):2725-2735. doi: 10.1109/TSG.5165411
[49]	ZHAO J, MILI L, WANG M. A generalized false data injection attacks against power system nonlinear state estimator and countermeasures[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2018, 33(5):4868-4877. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.59
[50]	YU W, XUE Y, LUO J, et al. An UHV grid security and stability defense system:Considering the risk of power system communication[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2015, 7(1):491-500. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2015.2392100
[51]	张嘉誉, 章坚民, 杨才明, 等. 基于信息物理融合的智能变电站过程层网络异常流量检测[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019, 43(14):173-181.
	ZHANG Jiayu, ZHANG Jianmin, YANG Caiming, et al. Intelligent substation process layer network abnormal flow detection based on physical information fusion[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019, 43(14):173-181.
[52]	陈碧云, 李弘斌, 李滨. 伪量测建模与AUKF在配电网虚假数据注入攻击辨识中的应用[J]. 电网技术, 2019, 43(9):3226-3234.
	CHEN Biyun, LI Hongbin, LI Bin. Application of pseudo-measurement modeling and AUKF in identification of fake data injection attack in distribution network[J]. Power System Technology, 2019, 43(9):3226-3234.
[53]	ZHAO J, ZHANG G, SCALA M L, et al. Short-term state forecasting-aided method for detection of smart grid general false data injection attacks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2015, 8(4):1580-1590. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2015.2492827
[54]	SHI D, LIN P, WANG Y, et al. Deception attack detection of isolated DC microgrids under consensus-based distributed voltage control architecture[J]. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems, 2021, 11(1):155-167. doi: 10.1109/JETCAS.5503868
[55]	章坚民, 张嘉誉, 倪明, 等. 智能变电站通信网络的广义信源和流量计算模型[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019, 43(13):147-155.
	ZHANG Jianmin, ZHANG Jiayu, NI Ming, et al. Generalized source and flow calculation model for intelligent substation communication network[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019, 43(13):147-155.
[56]	KHAN M M S, GIRALDO J A, PARVANIA M. Attack detection in power distribution systems using a cyber-physical real-time reference model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2021, 13(2):1490-1499. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2021.3128034
[57]	ESMALIFALAK M, LIU L, NGUYEN N, et al. Detecting stealthy false data injection using machine learning in smart grid[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2014, 11(3):1644-1652. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2014.2341597
[58]	LI F, XIE R, YANG B, et al. Detection and identification of cyber and physical attacks on distribution power grids with PVS:An online high-dimensional data-driven approach[J]. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 2022, 10(1):1282-1291. doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2019.2943449
[59]	HE Y, MENDIS G J, WEI J. Real-time detection of false data injection attacks in smart grid:A deep learning-based intelligent mechanism[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2017, 8(5):2505-2516. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2017.2703842
[60]	GANJKHANI M, GILANIFAR M, GIRALDO J, et al. Integrated cyber and physical anomaly location and classification in power distribution systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2021, 17(10):7040-7049. doi: 10.1109/TII.2021.3065080
[61]	HABIBI M R, BAGHAEE H R, DRAGICEVIC T, et al. Detection of false data injection cyber-attacks in DC microgrids based on recurrent neural networks[J]. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 2020, 9(5):5294-5310. doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2020.2968243
[62]	ZHANG Y, WANG J, CHEN B. Detecting false data injection attacks in smart grids:A semi-supervised deep learning approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2020, 12(1):623-634. doi: 10.1109/TSG.5165411
[63]	FARAJZADEH-ZANJANI M, HALLAJI E, RAZAVI-FAR R, et al. Adversarial semi-supervised learning for diagnosing faults and attacks in power grids[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2021, 12(4):3468-3478. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2021.3061395
[64]	LI Q, ZHANG J, ZHAO J, et al. Adaptive hierarchical cyber attack detection and localization in active distribution systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2022, 13(3):2369-2380. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2022.3148233
[65]	ZHANG Y, WANG L, SUN W, et al. Distributed intrusion detection system in a multi-layer network architecture of smart grids[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2011, 2(4):796-808. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2011.2159818
[66]	SHURMAN M M, KHRAIS R M, YATEEM A A. IoT denial-of-service attack detection and prevention using hybrid IDS[C]// 2019 International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT), December 03-05,2019,Al Ain, United Arab Emirates. IEEE, 2019:252-254.
[67]	ZHANG F, KODITUWAKKU H A D E, HINES J W, et al. Multilayer data-driven cyber-attack detection system for industrial control systems based on network,system,and process data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2019, 15(7):4362-4369. doi: 10.1109/TII.9424
[68]	SINGH V K, GOVINDARASU M. Cyber kill chain-based hybrid intrusion detection system for smart grid[M]. Cham:Springer, 2021.
[69]	胡志豪, 童宁, 刘琦, 等. 计及通信可靠性影响的配电终端分阶段选址选型及组网策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019, 43(13):89-97.
	HU Zhihao, TONG Ning, LIU Qi, et al. Phase location selection and networking strategy of distribution terminal considering influence of communication reliability[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019, 43(13):89-97.
[70]	RATH S, PAL D, SHARMA P S, et al. A cyber-secure distributed control architecture for autonomous AC microgrid[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2020, 15(3):3324-3335. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2020.3020968
[71]	LI X, TIAN Y C, LEDWICH G, et al. Constrained optimization of multicast routing for wide area control of smart grid[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2018, 10(4):3801-3808. doi: 10.1109/TSG.5165411
[72]	XU L, GUO Q, YANG T, et al. Robust routing optimization for smart grids considering cyber-physical interdependence[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2018, 10(5):5620-5629. doi: 10.1109/TSG.5165411
[73]	高昆仑, 辛耀中, 李钊, 等. 智能电网调度控制系统安全防护技术及发展[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2015(1):48-52.
	GAO Kunlun, XIN Yaozhong, LI Zhao, et al. Smart grid dispatching control system security protection technology and development[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2015(1):48-52.
[74]	陈武晖, 陈文淦, 薛安成. 面向协同信息攻击的物理电力系统安全风险评估与防御资源分配[J]. 电网技术, 2019, 43(7):2353-2360.
	CHEN Wuhui, CHEN Wengan, XUE Ancheng. Collaborative information attack oriented security risk assessment and defense resource allocation for physical power system[J]. Power System Technology, 2019, 43(7):2353-2360.
[75]	王电钢, 黄林, 刘捷, 等. 考虑负荷虚假数据注入攻击的电力信息物理系统防御策略[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2019, 47(1):28-34.
	WANG Diangang, HUANG Lin, LIU Jie, et al. Defense strategy of power information physical system considering load spurious data injection attack[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2019, 47(1):28-34.
[76]	石立宝, 简洲. 基于动态攻防博弈的电力信息物理融合系统脆弱性评估[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2016, 40(17):99-105.
	SHI Libao, JIAN Zhou. Vulnerability assessment of power information physical fusion system based on dynamic offense and defense game[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2016, 40(17):99-105.
[77]	GOL M, ABUR A. PMU placement for robust state estimation[C]// 2013 North American Power Symposium (NAPS), September 22-24,2013,Manhattan,KS,USA. IEEE, 2013:1-5.
[78]	HAO J, PIECHOCKI R J, KALESHI D, et al. Sparse malicious false data injection attacks and defense mechanisms in smart grids[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2015, 11(5):1-12. doi: 10.1109/TII.2015.2475695
[79]	BI S, ZHANG Y J. Graphical methods for defense against false-data injection attacks on power system state estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2014, 5(3):1216-1227. doi: 10.1109/TSG.5165411
[80]	LIU X, LI Z, LI Z. Optimal protection strategy against false data injection attacks in power systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2016, 8(4):1802-1810. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2015.2508449
[81]	ZHANG Y, WANG J, LIU J. Attack identification and correction for PMU GPS spoofing in unbalanced distribution systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2019, 11(1):762-773. doi: 10.1109/TSG.5165411
[82]	FAN X, DU L, DUAN D. Synchrophasor data correction under GPS spoofing attack:A state estimation-based approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2017, 9(5):4538-4546. doi: 10.1109/TSG.5165411
[83]	WANG X, SHI D, WANG J, et al. Online identification and data recovery for PMU data manipulation attack[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2019, 10(6):5889-5898. doi: 10.1109/TSG.5165411
[84]	KHALID H M, PENG J C H. A Bayesian algorithm to enhance the resilience of WAMS applications against cyber attacks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2016, 7(4):2026-2037. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2016.2544854
[85]	NI M, LI M, WU Y, et al. Concept and research framework for coordinated situation awareness and active defense of cyber-physical power systems against cyber-attacks[J]. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 2020, 9(3):477-484. doi: 10.35833/MPCE.2018.000830
[86]	李满礼, 倪明, 颜云松, 等. 面向恶意攻击的安全稳定控制系统信息物理协调防御方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(18):113-121.
	LI Manli, NI Ming, YAN Yunsong, et al. Information physical coordination defense method for security and stability control system facing malicious attack[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45(18):113-121.
[87]	HONG J, NUQUI R, ISHCHENKO D, et al. Cyber-physical security test bed:A platform for enabling collaborative cyber defense methods[C]// PACWorld Americas Conference, 2015.
[88]	ZHOU Q, SHAHIDEHPOUR M, ALABDULWAHAB A, et al. Cross-layer distributed control strategy for cyber resilient microgrids[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2021, 12(5):3705-3717. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2021.3069331
[89]	LIAN Z, GUO F, WEN C, et al. Distributed resilient optimal current sharing control for an islanded DC microgrid under DoS attacks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2021, 12(5):4494-4505. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2021.3084348
[90]	ZHANG B, DOU C, YUE D, et al. A cyber-physical cooperative hierarchical control strategy for islanded microgrid facing with random communication failure[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2020, 14(2):2849-2860. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.4267003
[91]	CHLELA M, MASCARELLA D, JOOS G, et al. Fallback control for isochronous energy storage systems in autonomous microgrids under denial-of-service cyber-attacks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2017, 9(5):4702-4711. doi: 10.1109/TSG.5165411
[92]	董旭柱, 黄邵远, 陈柔伊, 等. 智能配电网自愈控制技术[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2012, 36(18):17-21.
	DONG Xuzhu, HUANG Shaoyuan, CHEN Rouyi, et al. Self-healing control technology of intelligent distribution network[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2012, 36(18):17-21.
[93]	童晓阳, 王睿晗, 王洪彬, 等. 基于有限 PMU 的电网故障在线识别算法研究[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2016, 44(19):49-55.
	TONG Xiaoyang, WANG Ruihan, WANG Hongbin, et al. Research on online fault identification algorithm of power grid based on finite PMU[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2016, 44(19):49-55.
[94]	郭霖徽, 刘亚东, 王鹏, 等. 基于相空间重构与平均电导特征的配电网单相接地故障辨识[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019, 43(7):192-198.
	GUO Linhui, LIU Yadong, WANG Peng, et al. Identification of single-phase grounding fault in distribution network based on phase space reconstruction and average conductance characteristics[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019, 43(7):192-198.
[95]	谢李为, 李勇, 罗隆福, 等. 基于距离矩阵与分支系数的配电网故障定位方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40(7):2180-2191.
	XIE Liwei, LI Yong, LUO Longfu, et al. Fault location method of distribution network based on distance matrix and branch coefficient[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020, 40(7):2180-2191.
[96]	谢李为, 李勇, 罗隆福, 等. 基于极点对称分解的多分支线路故障定位方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(21):7326-7338.
	XIE Liwei, LI Yong, LUO Longfu, et al. Fault location method of multi-branch line based on pole symmetric decomposition[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41(21):7326-7338.
[97]	朱革兰, 李松奕, 兰金晨, 等. 基于零序特征量的配电网接地故障区段定位方法[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2021, 41(1):34-40,68.
	ZHU Gelan, LI Songyi, LAN Jinchen, et al. Locating method of distribution network earthing fault section based on zero sequence characteristic quantity[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2021, 41(1):34-40,68.
[98]	DANTANS R, LIANG J, UGALDE-LOO C E, et al. Progressive fault isolation and grid restoration strategy for MTDC networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2017, 33(2):909-918. doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.61
[99]	GOLSHANI A, SUN W, ZHOU Q, et al. Two-stage adaptive restoration decision support system for a self-healing power grid[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2017, 13(6):2802-2812. doi: 10.1109/TII.9424
[100]	FAN B, ZHENG C X, TANG L R, et al. Critical nodes identification for vulnerability analysis of power communication networks[J]. IET Commun., 2020, 14(4):703-713. doi: 10.1049/cmu2.v14.4
[101]	聂晓音, 谢刚, 李洋, 等. 基于栈式相关性稀疏自编码的电力通信网故障诊断[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2019, 47(19):158-163.
	NIE Xiaoyin, XIE Gang, LI Yang, et al. Power communication network fault diagnosis based on stack correlation sparse auto-coding[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2019, 47(19):158-163.
[102]	LV J, LIU Y, GAO K, et al. Service awareness recovery under N-1 failure in power grid optical communication networks[C]// 2021 IEEE 4th International Conference on Automation,Electronics and Electrical Engineering (AUTEEE), November 19-21,2021,Shenyang,China. IEEE, 2021:303-306.
[103]	BEHFARNIA A, ESLAMI A. Error correction coding meets cyber-physical systems:Message-passing analysis of self-healing interdependent networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2017, 65(7):2753-2768. doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2017.2698480
[104]	曾广璇, 余涛, 林丹, 等. 基于分布式馈线自动化的配电信息物理系统可靠性评估[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2020, 40(12):57-65.
	ZENG Guangxuan, YU Tao, LIN Dan, et al. Reliability evaluation of distribution information physical system based on distributed feeder automation[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2020, 40(12):57-65.
[105]	刘文霞, 宫琦, 郭经, 等. 基于混合通信网的主动配电信息物理系统可靠性评价[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38(6):1706-1718.
	LIU Wenxia, GONG Qi, GUO Jing, et al. Reliability evaluation of active distribution information physical system based on hybrid communication network[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38(6):1706-1718.
[106]	徐登辉, 王妍彦, 张有兵, 等. 不确定性环境下考虑信息失效的主动配电网可靠性评估[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2020, 44(22):134-142.
	XU Denghui, WANG Yanyan, ZHANG Youbing, et al. Reliability evaluation of active distribution network considering information failure in uncertain environment[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2020, 44(22):134-142.
[107]	SEIGER R, HUBER S, SCHLEGEL T. Toward an execution system for self-healing workflows in cyber-physical systems[J]. Software & Systems Modeling, 2018, 17(2):551-572.
[108]	RATASICH D, HÖFTBERGER O, ISAKOVIC H, et al. A self-healing framework for building resilient cyber-physical systems[C]// 2017 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC), May 16-18,2017,Toronto,ON,Canada. IEEE, 2017:133-140.
[109]	王宇, 李俊娥, 周亮, 等. 针对嵌入式终端安全威胁的电力工控系统自愈体系[J]. 电网技术, 2020, 44(9):3582-3594.
	WANG Yu, LI June, ZHOU Liang, et al. Self-healing system of power industrial control system for embedded terminal security threat[J]. Power System Technology, 2020, 44(9):3582-3594.
[110]	张志鹏, 李勇, 曹一家, 等. 通信和电网联合仿真的配电网局部异常因子故障辨识算法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2016, 40(17):44-50.
	ZHANG Zhipeng, LI Yong, CAO Yijia, et al. Fault identification algorithm of local abnormal factors in distribution network based on communication and network co-simulation[J]. Automation of Electric Power System, 2016, 40(17):44-50.
[111]	郭文花, 张学军. 一种基于CPS的多源配电网故障定位与隔离方案[J]. 自动化技术与应用, 2016, 35(1):82-85,110.
	GUO Wenhua, ZHANG Xuejun. A fault location and isolation scheme of multi-source distribution network based on CPS[J]. Techniques of Automation and Applications, 2016, 35(1):82-85,110.
[112]	李稳国. 电力网络拓扑优化与弹性提升方法研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2019.
	LI Wenguo. Research on topology optimization and elastic lifting method of power network[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2019.
[113]	MA T, ALI S, YUE T. Conceptually understanding uncertainty in self-healing cyber-physical systems[R]. Simula Research Lab Technical Report, 2016.
[114]	MA T, ALI S, YUE T. Testing self-healing cyber-physical systems under uncertainty with reinforcement learning:An empirical study[J]. Empirical Software Engineering, 2021, 26(3):1-54. doi: 10.1007/s10664-020-09901-z

类型	优点	不足	未来研究方向	相关文献
AIDM	对已知或未知的网络攻击均具备较好的检测效果，漏报率低	需要针对特定系统进行调制，不便于规模化推广应用；具备相对高的误报率	AIDM检测阈值的一般化计算方法；无需人工定义检测阈值的AIDM	[49⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓-56]
SIDM	对已记录行为特征的网络攻击具备较好的识别能力；不需要复杂的系统建模过程	需要相当数量与质量的电气数据进行训练；对未知网络攻击的识别能力存在局限，需要频繁手动更新数据特征库	小样本训练数据下的人工智能网络攻击检测技术；网络攻击特征库自动更新技术	[57⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓-65]
HIDM	对已知攻击的低误报率、对未知攻击的高检测准确率	未充分发挥不同类检测方法混合带来的检测能力提升	协调优化不同类型IDM的混合方式，挖掘HIDM潜在能力；研究匹配配电网与微电网系统特点的HIDM	[66⇓-68]

智能配用电系统的网络攻击检测与保护控制技术：发展与挑战^*

Cyber Attack Detection and Protection Control Technology for Smart Power Distribution and Utilization System：Developments and Challenges

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 114

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈洋, 蔡晔, 汤丽, 曹一家, 刘颖. 减小电网信息物理系统停电风险的信息网局部演化模型^*[J]. 电气工程学报, 2022, 17(3): 162-169.
[2]	董昊轩, 殷国栋, 庄伟超, 陈浩, 周毅晨, 汪?. 基于迭代动态规划的网联电动汽车经济性巡航车速优化[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(6): 121-130.
[3]	张映锋, 郭振刚, 钱成, 李锐. 基于过程感知的底层制造资源智能化建模及其自适应协同优化方法研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(16): 1-10.
[4]	徐钢, 张晓彤, 黎敏, 徐金梧. 基于嵌入式CPS模型的产品质量在线管控方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(12): 94-101.