Study on Oil Compatibility and Thermal Aging Performance of Composite Insulation Tube

doi:10.11985/2021.02.010

Abstract

Abstract:

In the oil-immersed equipment with composite insulation jacket, glass fiber reinforced epoxy resin insulation tube should be used as the main insulation container. The composite insulation tube has long-term contact with the insulating oil, and has been tested under various operating conditions. In order to study the compatibility and long-term stability of insulating pipe and oil, three kinds of insulating pipe materials with different formulations are treated by oil immersion heat aging, and the frequency domain dielectric spectroscopy and gas chromatography related to the compatibility of insulating oil after different aging time are analyzed. The breakdown voltage test, partial discharge characteristic test, surface morphology, frequency domain dielectric spectrum and other anti-thermal oil aging properties of insulating tube materials with different aging time are studied. According to the test results, the thermal oil aging resistance of insulating pipe materials with different aging time is analyzed, and the thermal oil aging resistance and aging resistance of insulating pipe materials with different formulations are compared. The results show that higher shallow trap density is beneficial to charge dissipation, reduce the occurrence of partial discharge and improve the electrical resistance. In addition, the lower degree of epoxy resin decomposition and glass fiber fracture during aging eventually showed good oil compatibility. The results can provide optimal formula and theoretical basis for improving the operation life and reliability of oil immersion equipment with composite insulation jacket.

Key words: Insulating tube, breakdown voltage, partial discharge, frequency domain dielectric spectrum

CLC Number:

TM216

LEI Yuxing, WANG Ke, YU Yu, YANG Yan, LI Gang, GAO Bo, WU Guangning. Study on Oil Compatibility and Thermal Aging Performance of Composite Insulation Tube[J]. Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2021, 16(2): 77-85.

Figures/Tables 20

References 15

[1]	阮羚, 刘睿, 赵健康, 等. 绝缘管型母线的行业现状分析及关键技术展望[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(6):67-76.
	RUAN Ling, LIU Rui, ZHAO Jiankang, et al. Industry status analysis and key technology prospect of insulated tubular bus[J]. China Electric Power, 2018, 51(6):67-76.
[2]	祝伟强, 付芸. 主变变低绝缘管型母线故障分析[J]. 电气技术, 2019, 20(5):96-99.
	ZHU Weiqiang, FU Yun. Fault analysis of main transformer low insulation tubular bus[J]. Electrical Technology, 2019, 20(5):96-99.
[3]	任想, 祁利, 潘雪莉, 等. 基于全过程技术管控的绝缘管型母线性能及工程质量提升[J]. 湖北电力, 2019, 43(5):45-52.
	REN Xiang, QI Li, PAN Xueli, et al. Insulation tube bus performance and engineering quality improvement based on whole process technical control[J]. Hubei Electric Power, 2019, 43(5):45-52.
[4]	梁培松, 刘云鹏, 梁英. 添加陶瓷粉对复合绝缘子微观电特性的影响[J]. 电气工程学报, 2015, 10(6):71-77.
	LIANG Peisong, LIU Yunpeng, LIANG Ying. Effect of adding ceramic powder to micro-electrical characteristics of composite insulators[J]. Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2015, 10(6):71-77.
[5]	曾磊磊, 张宇, 童超, 等. 复合绝缘子HTV硅橡胶伞套的湿热老化特性研究[J]. 电瓷避雷器, 2020(1):214-221.
	ZENG Leilei, ZHANG Yu, TONG Chao, et al. Study on hygrothermal aging characteristics of HTV silicone rubber sheds of composite insulators[J]. Insulators and Surge Arresters, 2020(1):214-221.
[6]	梁曦东, 戴建军, 周远翔, 等. 超声法检测绝缘子用玻璃钢芯棒脆断裂纹的研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2005(3):112-116.
	LIANG Xidong, DAI Jianjun, ZHOU Yuanxiang, et al. Ultrasonic detecion on crack of frp rod in brittle fracture of composite insulator[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2005(3):112-116.
[7]	梁曦东, 王成胜, 范炬. 合成绝缘子芯棒脆断性能及试验方法的研究[J]. 电网技术, 2003(1):34-37.
	LIANG Xidong, WANG Chengsheng, FAN Ju. Research on brittle fracture performance and test method of composite insulator core rod[J]. Grid Technology, 2003(1):34-37.
[8]	何愈, 何俊凌, 赵玉顺, 等. 特高压电气设备用高性能复合绝缘材料配方的研制[J]. 热固性树脂, 2020, 35(6):54-61.
	HE Yu, HE Junling, ZHAO Yushun, et al. Development of high performance composite insulating material formula for UHV electrical equipment[J]. Thermosetting Resin, 2020, 35(6):54-61.
[9]	李进, 王雨帆, 杜伯学, 等. 高压电工装备用环氧树脂绝缘材料改性研究进展[J]. 广东电力, 2019, 32(12):3-11.
	LI Jin, WANG Yufan, DU Boxue, et al. Modification research progress of epoxy resin insulation materials for high voltage electrical apparatus[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2019, 32(12):3-11.
[10]	南洪尧, 李岳, 李志刚. 玻璃纤维增强环氧树脂力学性能研究[J]. 湘潭大学学报, 2018, 40(3):46-50.
	NAN Hongyao, LI Yue, LI Zhigang. Study on mechanical properties of glass fiber reinforced epoxy resin[J]. Journal of Xiangtan University, 2018, 40(3):46-50.
[11]	付晨阳, 倪爱清, 王继辉, 等. 紫外老化对玻璃纤维增强环氧树脂基复合材料疲劳性能的影响[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2020(7):74-80.
	FU Chenyang, NI Aiqing, WANG Jihui, et al. Effect of UV aging on fatigue properties of glass fiber reinforced epoxy resin matrix composites[J]. Composite Science and Engineering, 2020(7):74-80.
[12]	谭荣, 谢林, 陈骁. 温度对玻璃纤维增强型环氧树脂直流绝缘特性的影响[J]. 低温与超导, 2020, 48(8):18-20,25.
	TAN Rong, XIE Lin, CHEN Xiao. Effect of temperature on DC insulation properties of glass fiber reinforced epoxy resin[J]. Cryogenics & Superconductivity, 2020, 48(8):18-20,25.
[13]	冉昭玉, 杜伯学, 李进, 等. 环氧复合材料表面电位衰减与直流电导特性[J]. 电气工程学报, 2018, 13(11):65-70,78.
	RAN Zhaoyu, DU Boxue, LI Jin, et al. Surface potential decay and DC conductivity characteristics[J]. Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2018, 13(11):65-70,78.
[14]	王国建, 孙耀宁, 蒋万乐. 玻璃纤维增强环氧树脂基复合材料在温湿和紫外辐照环境中的老化行为[J]. 机械工程材料, 2018, 42(9):11-15,20.
	WANG Guojian, SUN Yaoning, JIANG Wanle. Aging behavior of glass fiber reinforced epoxy resin matrix composites in warm,humid and ultraviolet radiation environments[J]. Materials for Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 42(9):11-15,20.
[15]	王国建, 孙耀宁, 姜宏, 等. 湿热-高温循环老化对环氧乙烯基酯树脂/玻璃纤维复合材料性能影响[J]. 工程塑料应用, 2020, 48(9):121-126,132.
	WANG Guojian, SUN Yaoning, JIANG Hong, et al. Effect of hygrothermal-high temperature cycle aging on properties of epoxy vinyl ester resin/glass fiber composites[J]. Engineering Plastics Application, 2020, 48(9):121-126,132.

时间/天	HX-1#	ZJ	WJ
0	48.42	38.24	44.27
10	47.83	37.66	43.01
20	44.58	35.6	42.02
30	40.06	30.01	38.62
40	33.76	27.35	31.43

电压/kV	最大放电量			平均放电量
电压/kV	HX-1#	WJ	ZJ	HX-1	WJ	ZJ
10	27.33	45.16	44.81	12.83	16.62	26.45
11	26.06	49.75	42.88	12.2	11.6	22.58
12	39.87	60.73	50.35	16.93	20.33	26.37
13	64.24	83.53	98.4	19.3	65.19	29.28
14	81.53	95.39	107.3	23.05	63.11	33.07
15	91.1	111.7	128.7	20.25	75.22	35.41
16	125.8	115.3	161.8	29.89	89.7	33.41
17	133.8	158.3	206.3	31.85	90.73	36.8
20	207.2	222.4	259.1	108.8	113.6	132.47
25	905	1 103	1 246	201.55	218.47	220.4
30	2 760	2 796	3 002	380.4	396.58	402.3
35	4 013	4 336	5 590	529.3	544.6	611.7