电力信息耦合网络电力侧对信息侧鲁棒性影响研究 *

doi:10.11985/2020.04.003

电气工程学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4): 27-34.doi: 10.11985/2020.04.003

扫码分享

电力信息耦合网络电力侧对信息侧鲁棒性影响研究 ^*

李琰(), 吴妍瑜(), 徐天奇

云南民族大学电气信息工程学院昆明 650500

收稿日期:2020-05-15 修回日期:2020-10-15 出版日期:2020-12-25 发布日期:2020-12-25
通讯作者: 吴妍瑜 E-mail:hust@gmail.com;wyy0316@sina.com
作者简介:吴妍瑜,女,1997年生,硕士研究生。主要研究方向为电力信息耦合网络。E-mail： wyy0316@sina.com
李琰,女,1977年生,博士,副教授,硕士研究生导师。主要研究方向为智能电网,物理信息系统等。E-mail：liyan. hust@gmail.com
基金资助:
*国家自然科学基金资助项目(61761049)

Research on the Robustness of the Information System Influenced by the Power System Based on the Cyber-physical Coupling System

LI Yan(), WU Yanyu(), XU Tianqi

School of Electrical Information Engineering, Yunnan Minzu University, Kunming 650500

Received:2020-05-15 Revised:2020-10-15 Online:2020-12-25 Published:2020-12-25
Contact: WU Yanyu E-mail:hust@gmail.com;wyy0316@sina.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究耦合网络单侧网络拓扑结构对另一侧网络鲁棒性的影响,首先基于复杂网络理论对电力信息耦合网络进行建模,其次建立级联失效传播模型,分析电力信息耦合网络电力侧网络拓扑结构特性对信息侧鲁棒性的影响,最后针对单侧电力网的拓扑结构特点,分别提出基于介数删边策略、保护高介数节点策略和基于最短路径加边策略。仿真结果表明,无论在随机节点攻击模式下还是高度数节点攻击下,BA-118耦合网络单侧信息网都表现出强于WS-118和ER-118的单侧信息网的鲁棒性,并且基于介数删边策略、保护高介数节点策略和基于最短路径加边策略在对应耦合网络单侧信息网中都能提高其鲁棒性。

关键词: 耦合网络, 复杂网络, 级联失效, 鲁棒性, 保护策略

Abstract:

To study the influence of the topology of one side of the coupling network on the robustness of the other side, firstly, the power information coupling network is modeled based on the complex network theory, and then the cascaded failure propagation model is established to analyze the influence of the topology characteristics of the power side of the power information coupling network on the robustness of the information side. Finally, according to the characteristics of topology of one-sided power network, the strategies based on the betweenness edge deletion, the high betweenness node protection and the shortest path edge addition are proposed respectively. The simulation results show that the single side of information network of BA-118 coupling network is stronger than that of WS-118 and ER-118, no matter in random node attack mode or high-degree node attack mode, and the strategies based on the betweenness edge deletion, the high betweenness node protection and the shortest path edge addition can improve the robustness of the information-sided network of the coupling networks correspondingly.

Key words: Coupling networks, complex networks, cascading failure, robustness, protection strategy

中图分类号:

TM743

李琰, 吴妍瑜, 徐天奇. 电力信息耦合网络电力侧对信息侧鲁棒性影响研究 ^*[J]. 电气工程学报, 2020, 15(4): 27-34.

LI Yan, WU Yanyu, XU Tianqi. Research on the Robustness of the Information System Influenced by the Power System Based on the Cyber-physical Coupling System[J]. Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2020, 15(4): 27-34.

图/表 5

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

参考文献 23

[1]	赵俊华, 文福拴, 薛禹胜, 等. 电力信息物理融合系统的建模分析与控制研究框架[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2011,35(16):1-8.
	ZHAO Junhua, WEN Fushuan, XUE Yusheng, et al. Modeling analysis and control research framework of cyber physical power systems[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2011,35(16):1-8.
[2]	郭庆来, 辛蜀骏, 王剑辉, 等. 由乌克兰停电事件看信息能源系统综合安全评估[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2016,40(5):145-147.
	GUO Qinglai, XIN Shujun, WANG Jianhui, et al. Comprehensive security assessment for a cyber physical energy system:A lesson from Ukraine’s blackout[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2016,40(5):145-147.
[3]	BULDYREV S V, PARSHANI R, PAUL G, et al. Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks[J]. Nature, 2010,464(7291):1025-1028. doi: 10.1038/nature08932 pmid: 20393559
[4]	冀星沛, 王波, 刘涤尘, 等. 相依网络理论及其在电力信息-物理系统结构脆弱性分析中的应用综述[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016,36(17):4521-4532.
	JI Xingpei, WANG Bo, LIU Dichen, et al. Review on interdependent networks theory and its applications in the structural vulnerability analysis of electrical cyber-physical system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016,36(17):4521-4532.
[5]	张欣. 多层复杂网络理论研究进展:概念、理论和数据[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2015,12(2):103-107.
	ZHANG Xin. Research progress of multi-layer complex network theory:Concept,theory and data[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2015,12(2):103-107.
[6]	冀星沛, 王波, 董朝阳, 等. 电力信息-物理相互依存网络脆弱性评估及加边保护策略[J]. 电网技术, 2016,40(6):1867-1873.
	JI Xingpei, WANG Bo, DONG Zhaoyang, et al. Vulnerability evaluation and link addition protection strategy research of electrical cyber-physical interdependent networks[J]. Power System Technology, 2016,40(6):1867-1873.
[7]	董政呈, 方彦军, 田猛. 不同耦合方式和耦合强度对电力-通信耦合网络的影响[J]. 高电压技术, 2015,41(10):3464-3469.
	DONG Zhengcheng, FANG Yanjun, TIAN Meng. Influences of various coupled patterns and coupling strength on power-communication coupled networks[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2015,41(10):3464-3469.
[8]	SHIN D, QIAN D, ZHANG J. Cascading effects in interdependent networks[J]. IEEE Network, 2014,28(4):82-87.
[9]	刘润然, 贾春晓, 章剑林, 等. 相依网络在不同攻击策略下的鲁棒性[J]. 上海理工大学学报, 2012(03):35-39.
	LIU Runran, JIA Chunxiao, ZHANG Jianlin, et al. Robustness of interdependent networks under several intentional attack strategies[J]. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 2012,34(3):235-239.
[10]	HUANG X, GAO J, BULDYREV S V, et al. Robustness of interdependent networks under targeted attack[J]. Physical Review E, 2011,83(6):65101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.065101
[11]	吴凌杰, 邹艳丽, 王瑞瑞, 等. 电力信息相互依存网络与单层电网的级联故障比较[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学2018, 15(3):11-18.
	WU Lingjie, ZOU Yanli, WANG Ruirui, et al. Comparison of cascading failures between power information interdependent networks and single-layer power grids[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2018,15(3):11-18.
[12]	ZHANG P, CHENG B, ZHAO Z, et al. The robustness of interdependent transportation networks under targeted attack[J]. EPL, 2013,103(6):68005. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/103/68005
[13]	付丹龙, 朱淑华, 原智峰, 等. 基于不同子网络级联机制的相依网络鲁棒性研究[J]. 计算机工程与科学, 2018,40(3):439-444.
	FU Danlong, ZHU Shuhua, YUAN Zhifeng, et al. Robustness of interdependent networks based on different subnet cascade mechanisms[J]. Computer Engineering and Science, 2018,40(3):439-444.
[14]	WANG J, WU Y, LI Y. Attack robustness of cascading load model in interdependent networks[J]. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 2015,26(3):1550030. doi: 10.1142/S0129183115500308
[15]	CHEN Z, WU J, XIA Y, et al. Robustness of interdependent power grids and communication networks:A complex network perspective[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II:Express Briefs, 2017: 115-119.
[16]	王先培, 朱国威, 贺瑞娟, 等. 复杂网络理论在电力CPS级联失效研究中的应用综述[J]. 电网技术, 2017,41(9):2947-2956.
	WANG Xianpei, ZHU Guowei, HE Ruijuan, et al. Survey of cascading failures in cyber physical power system based on complex network theory[J]. Power System Technology, 2017,41(9):2947-2956.
[17]	郭世泽, 陆泽明. 复杂网络基础理论[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2012.
	GUO Shize, LU Zeming. The basic theory of complex networks[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2012.
[18]	韩宇奇, 郭创新, 朱炳铨, 等. 基于改进渗流理论的信息物理融合电力系统连锁故障模型[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2016,40(17):30-37.
	HAN Yuqi, GUO Chuangxin, ZHU Bingquan, et al. Model cascading failures in cyber physical power system based on improved percolation theory[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2016,40(17):30-37.
[19]	WATTS D J, STROGATZ S H. Collective dynamics of small world networks[J]. Nature, 1998,393(6684):440-442. doi: 10.1038/30918 pmid: 9623998
[20]	BARABASI A L, ALBERT R. Emergence of scaling in random networks[J]. Science, 1999,286(5439):509-512. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509 pmid: 10521342
[21]	ERDOS P, RENYI A. On random graphs[J]. Publications Mathematicae, 1959,6:290-297.
[22]	史进, 涂光瑜, 罗毅. 电力系统复杂网络特性分析与模型改进[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2008(25):95-100.
	SHI Jin, TU Guangyu, LUO Yi. Complex network characteristic analysis and model improving of the power system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2008(25):95-100.
[23]	王建伟, 荣莉莉, 王铎. 基于节点局域特征的复杂网络上相继故障模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2010,13(8):42-50.
	WANG Jianwei, RONG Lili, WANG Duo, et al. Model for cascading failures on complex networks based on local characteristics of nodes[J]. Journal of Management Sciences, 2010,13(8):42-50.

耦合网络		信息网
小世界-118耦合网络(WS-118)	WS小世界网络	118节点网络
无标度-118耦合网络(BA-118)	BA无标度网络	118节点网络
随机-118耦合网络(ER-118)	ER随机网络	118节点网络

电力信息耦合网络电力侧对信息侧鲁棒性影响研究 ^*

Research on the Robustness of the Information System Influenced by the Power System Based on the Cyber-physical Coupling System

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	俞沛宙,杨刚,杨继辉,张宇华,薛花,黄珂. 基于自适应反推的永磁同步电动机转速控制策略^*[J]. 电气工程学报, 2020, 15(3): 38-43.
[2]	董晨阳, 郑小云, 余建波. 基于过程挖掘与复杂网络集成的制造过程资源建模与关键加工节点识别[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(3): 169-180.
[3]	蒋正荣,黎佳慧,张智瑜. 高压除尘电源中的移相控制技术[J]. 电气工程学报, 2019, 14(1): 61-65.
[4]	张永昌,焦健,刘杰. 电压型PWM整流器无模型预测电流控制[J]. 电气工程学报, 2018, 13(6): 1-6.
[5]	魏琼, 焦宗夏, 吴帅, 王君, 汤亮. 气动伺服加载系统的非线性复合控制[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(14): 217-224.
[6]	张永昌,高素雨. 考虑延时补偿的永磁同步电机电流预测控制[J]. 电气工程学报, 2016, 11(3): 13-20.
[7]	刘阔, 孙名佳, 吴玉亮, 朱铁军. 无温度传感器的数控机床进给轴热误差补偿^*[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(15): 162-169.
[8]	余卓平, 徐松云, 熊璐, 广学令. 集成式电子液压制动系统鲁棒性液压力控制[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(16): 22-28.
[9]	刘曦泽;祁国宁;纪杨建;顾新建;徐新胜. 基于复杂网络与公理设计的产品平台设计方法[J]. , 2012, 48(11): 86-93.
[10]	韦进文;陈燕玲;覃禾群;郭俊杰. 基于广义叉积鲁棒性的识别式数据拟合[J]. , 2011, 47(14): 7-12.
[11]	栗茂林;杜海峰;庄健;王孙安. 基于模块性准则函数的模糊免疫网络聚类算法及其在故障诊断中的应用[J]. , 2010, 46(9): 100-106.
[12]	杜海峰;王娜;张进华;邵颉;王孙安. 基于复杂网络的故障诊断策略[J]. , 2010, 46(3): 90-96.
[13]	周吴;何晓平;苏伟;张凤田;李柏林. 基于误差灵敏度的静电刚度式谐振微加速度计频率鲁棒性设计[J]. , 2010, 46(10): 14-18.
[14]	刘夫云;祁国宁. 配置产品尺寸参数传递方法及其应用[J]. , 2007, 43(4): 144-151.
[15]	樊蓓蓓;祁国宁. 基于复杂网络的产品族结构建模及模块分析方法[J]. , 2007, 43(3): 187-192.